Placebos Getting More Effective, Drugmakers Desperate to Know Why

Merck was in trouble. In 2002, the pharmaceutical giant was falling behind its rivals in sales. Even worse, patents on five blockbuster drugs were about to expire, which would allow cheaper generics to flood the market. The company hadn’t introduced a truly new product in three years, and its stock price was plummeting.

In interviews with the press, Edward Scolnick, Merck’s research director, laid out his battle plan to restore the firm to preeminence. Key to his strategy was expanding the company’s reach into the antidepressant market, where Merck had lagged while competitors like Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline created some of the best-selling drugs in the world. “To remain dominant in the future,” he told Forbes, “we need to dominate the central nervous system.”

His plan hinged on the success of an experimental antidepressant codenamed MK-869. Still in clinical trials, it looked like every pharma executive’s dream: a new kind of medication that exploited brain chemistry in innovative ways to promote feelings of well-being. The drug tested brilliantly early on, with minimal side effects, and Merck touted its game-changing potential at a meeting of 300 securities analysts.

Behind the scenes, however, MK-869 was starting to unravel. True, many test subjects treated with the medication felt their hopelessness and anxiety lift. But so did nearly the same number who took a placebo, a look-alike pill made of milk sugar or another inert substance given to groups of volunteers in clinical trials to gauge how much more effective the real drug is by comparison. The fact that taking a faux drug can powerfully improve some people’s health—the so-called placebo effect—has long been considered an embarrassment to the serious practice of pharmacology.

Ultimately, Merck’s foray into the antidepressant market failed. In subsequent tests, MK-869 turned out to be no more effective than a placebo. In the jargon of the industry, the trials crossed the futility boundary.

More here: http://www.wired.com/medtech/drugs/magazine/17-09/ff_placebo_effect

Koba’s Note: My theory is that people are just so dependent on drugs these days that they can’t imagine them not working. I have a headache, here have some Aspirin. I’m sad, here take some Prozac. I have a sniffle, here have some Sudafed. My kid moves around too much, here give him some Ritalin. It’s fucking ridiculous.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Placebos Getting More Effective, Drugmakers Desperate to Know Why”

  1. Nox says:

    Actually, they could be depressed from low blood sugar. Thus a sugar, or even milk “placebo” would be a valid homeopathic treatment.

  2. loreandlaw says:

    Low sugar in this world??? not likely.

  3. Nox says:

    And thus, they do not test the focus group for it. They could have been on Atkins, or non-sweetened hamburgers, or vegetables.

Leave a Reply